Retrofitting an existing system can also decrease capacity, meaning a system must run longer and use more electricity in order to generate the same cooling output. EPA developed several fact sheets that discuss the HCFC phaseout and the choices available to consumers to provide technicians and equipment owners with additional information. There are two types of allowances: 1 production allowances and 2 consumption allowances. The text of 40 CFR EPA has never established a production baseline for HCFC, and the agency has no record of domestic production of HCFC for refrigeration or fire suppression uses during the baseline years As of January 1, under Section of the Clean Air Act , the EPA requires all technicians who, "maintain, service, repair, or dispose of equipment that could release ozone depleting refrigerants into the atmosphere must be certified". This approach has the lowest allocation in and of all options discussed in the proposed rule, which should encourage better refrigerant management practices, while a small, decreasing allocation in later years should allow for a smooth transition to zero in
Report Abusive Comment
EPA issues refrigerant rules
By allocating well below the projected need for HCFC each year, EPA is accounting for retrofitted equipment, recovery and reuse of refrigerant, use of reclaimed refrigerant, and existing inventory of virgin HCFC, in addition to realizing the benefits of a linear drawdown already discussed. One distribution company reports already seeing 50 percent less reclaimed material available to sell in On the other hand, the agency believes that reduced allocations and market changes increasing the value of the material will encourage proper recovery and decrease motivation to vent HCFCs, especially HCFC Under existing regulations, HCFC production and consumption are zero in Nevertheless, the milestone in section b is still relevant because it applies to each class II substance individually. While additional inventory data from more entities might further support a 10, MT starting point, these data would not eliminate the considerations that led EPA to finalize a non-zero allocation for
R Phaseout, Part One: What Does It Mean for the Industry?
Maybe Yes this page is useful No this page is not useful Is there anything wrong with this page? The agency received three comments regarding its plans to update regulations to account for recent changes to section a , all of which agreed with EPA's rationale and language regarding continued use of HCFCs as a fire suppression agent. Eighteen commenters urge EPA to finalize today's action as quickly as possible. Section c requires EPA to publish a list of the substitutes unacceptable for specific uses and to publish a corresponding list of substitutes acceptable for specific uses. Learn More This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. Chemical manufacturers, importers, and exporters are required to operate within this framework.
Agents include contractors and subcontractors, as well as other entities performing a service or task on behalf of the corporation or Federal agency. In , environmental and industry groups petitioned EPA to implement the required phaseout by eliminating the HCFCs with the highest ozone depletion potential first. An importer expends one consumption allowance for each kilogram imported. Specifically, the agency proposed amending Summary of This Final Action. Section a of the Clean Air Act limits the use of newly-produced i. Another commenter, Johnstone Supply, supports a five-year phaseout similar to Option 3 but with approximately two-thirds of the allocation cut.